From Knowledge Seeking to Ethical Action: The Elaboration of Taha Abdurrahman’s Philosophy to Address Student’s Information Overload

Kurniawan Dwi Saputra; Agus Himmawan Utomo

doi:10.37899/journallaedusci.v7i1.2777

Kurniawan Dwi Saputra Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia, Universitas Islam Indonesia
Agus Himmawan Utomo Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v7i1.2777

Keywords: Criticism, Intellectual Virtues, Ethics, Taha Abdurrahman, Responsibility

Abstract

Rather than cultivating critical thinking, the ease of access to information in digital world, leads many students into confusion. By developing Taha Abdurrahman’s theory of subject and Linda Zagzebski’s intellectual virtues, this study aims to propose an onto-ethical approach to address students learning problem caused by information overload. Using library-based qualitative research, the authors compare and synthesis Taha’s view on subject and Zagzebski’s intellectual virtue to foster a critical-responsible digital subject. Tahaian notion of subject, which received ethico-spiritual commitment through transcendental encounter with God, is proposed as a resilient subject for information overload. Authors argue that to overcome information overload among students, the praxis of digital engagement must be altered from information seeking activity towards a responsible ethical action. To engage in digital activities is to responsibly executes certain intellectual virtues in order to do something ethical. The two-folded attributes of Tahaian subject: criticism and responsibility are essential in fostering an ethical-aware autonomous learner. Complementing this framework, this article engages through Linda Zagzebski’s theory of intellectual virtues, to tackle digital-related pedagogical problems.

References

Aadland, M. G., & Heinström, J. (2024). ‘It never seems to stop’ Six high school students’ experiences of information overload. Information Research, 29(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.47989/IR292830

Abdurrahman, T. (1995). Fiqh Al-Falsafah: Al-Falsafah wa Al-Tarjamah. Al-Markaz Al-Tsaqafi Al-Araby.

Abdurrahman, T. (2016). Roh al-Haddatsah (4th ed.). Al-Markaz Al-Tsaqafy Al-Araby.

Abdurrahman, T. (2017). Diin al-Haya’: Min al-Fiqh al-I’timary ila al-Fiqh al-I’timany . Al-Muassasah al-Arabiyah li al-Fikr wa al-Ibda’.

Abdurrahman, T. (2020). Sual al-Akhlaq. Al-Markaz Al-Tsaqafy Al-Araby.

Adekoya, O. M., & Akune, C. (2023). INFORMATION OVERLOAD AND ITS EFFECTS ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS. Global Review of Library and Information Science (GRELIS), 19(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372310697_INFORMATION_OVERLOAD_AND_ITS_EFFECTS_ON_ACADEMIC_PERFORMANCE_OF_STUDENTS

Ajani, Y. A., Oladokun, B. D., Olarongbe, S. A., Amaechi, M. N., Rabiu, N., & Bashorun, M. T. (2024). Revitalizing indigenous knowledge systems via digital media technologies for sustainability of indigenous languages. Preservation, digital technology & culture, 53(1), 35-44.

Ali, Z., Janarthanan, J., & Mohan, P. (2024). Understanding Digital Dementia and Cognitive Impact in the Current Era of the Internet: A Review. Cureus, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.7759/CUREUS.70029,

Arnold, M., Goldschmitt, M., & Rigotti, T. (2023). Dealing with information overload: a comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1122200. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2023.1122200

Bandjar, A. (2022). Eudaimonia sebagai Gratifikasi Penggunaan Media Sosial. GLOBAL COMMUNICATION FOR ALL, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.33846/gca1101

Batak, K. (2016). ERNEST SOSA’NIN ERDEM EPİSTEMOLOJİSİ. Sakarya ÜNiversitesi İlahiyat FaküLtesi Dergisi (SAUIFD), 18(34), 1–29.

Benedetto, L., Rollo, S., Cafeo, A., Di Rosa, G., Pino, R., Gagliano, A., ... & Ingrassia, M. (2024). Emotional and behavioural factors predisposing to internet addiction: The smartphone distraction among Italian high school students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(4), 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040386

Daneels, R., Vandebosch, H., & Walrave, M. (2023). “Deeper Gaming”: A Literature Review and Research Agenda on Eudaimonia in Digital Games Research. 4(2: Summer 2023). https://doi.org/10.1037/700F6FF1.A873C1F4

Desinta, C., Novandari, W., & Pradisti, L. (2025). Much To Choose, Too Confused To Decide: Investigating Customer Confusion As A Mediator Of Information Overload And Decision Postponement. Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 5(2), 850–859. https://doi.org/10.55606/JAEMB.V5I2.7320

Fairweather, A., & Zagzebski, L. (Eds). (2001). Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility (A. Fairweather & L. Zagzebski, Eds.). Oxford University Press.

Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Gleeson, J., Vancampfort, D., Armitage, C. J., & Sarris, J. (2019). The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.1002/WPS.20617

Goriunova, O. (2019a). Digital subjects: an introduction. Subjectivity, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41286-018-00065-2/METRICS

Goriunova, O. (2019b). The Digital Subject: People as Data as Persons. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419840409

Hallaq, W. (2019). Reforming Modernity. In Reforming Modernity. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/HALL19388

Jingwen, H. (2024). The Dilemma and Breakthrough of Students Subjectivity in Digitalization of Education. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 49(6), 137. https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1005-6378.2024.06.010

Khazaei, Z. (2013). Epistemic Virtue from the Viewpoints of Mulla Sadra and Zagzebski. Religious Inquiries, 2(4), 21–39. https://ri.urd.ac.ir/article_11256.html

Lewis, K. O., Popov, V., & Fatima, S. S. (2024). From static web to metaverse: reinventing medical education in the post-pandemic era. Annals of medicine, 56(1), 2305694. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2305694

Liao, S., Yu, L., Kruger, J. L., & Reichle, E. D. (2024). Dynamic reading in a digital age: new insights on cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2023.08.002

Macgilchrist, F. (2018). The “digital subjects” of twenty-first-century education: On datafication, educational technology, and subject formation. Handbook of Cultural Studies and Education, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351202398-17/DIGITAL-SUBJECTS-TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY-EDUCATION-FELICITAS-MACGILCHRIST

Oliver, M. B., Raney, A. A., Slater, M. D., Appel, M., Hartmann, T., Bartsch, A., Schneider, F. M., Janicke-Bowles, S. H., Krämer, N., Mares, M. L., Vorderer, P., Rieger, D., Dale, K. R., & Das, E. (2018). Self-transcendent Media Experiences: Taking Meaningful Media to a Higher Level. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOC/JQX020

Pouivet, R. (2010). Moral and Epistemic Virtues: A Thomistic and Analytical Perspective. Forum Philosophicum, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35765/FORPHIL.2010.1501.01

Putri, S. E. S., & Pinandito, A. (2024). The Effect of Communication Overload, Information Overload, and Exhaustion on Student’s Learning Productivity. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 9(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.25126/JITECS.92589

Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/QUIN92204

Rakhmat, A. (2023). Religion and Reason in Contemporary Islamic Ethics: A Comparative Study of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas and Taha Abderrahmane Thought. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 13(2), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.32350/JITC.132.09

Rothenfluch, S. (2015). Virtue epistemology and tacit cognitive processes in high-grade knowledge. Philosophical Explorations, 18(3), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2015.1042020;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:RPEX20;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Rusnak, A., & Seals, Z. (2025). EudAImonia: Virtue Ethics and Artificial Intelligence. Christian Perspectives on Science and Technology, 3. https://doi.org/10.58913/ZNHR8688

Segev, A. (2024). Subjectivity as the Purpose of Education and Teaching. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 43(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11217-024-09936-5/METRICS

Shahrzadi, L., Mansouri, A., Alavi, M., & Shabani, A. (2024). Causes, consequences, and strategies to deal with information overload: A scoping review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2), 100261. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JJIMEI.2024.100261

Suleiman, F. (2020). The Philosophy of Taha Abderrahman: A Critical Study. Die Welt Des Islams, 61(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700607-00600A10

Tafesse, W., Aguilar, M. P., Sayed, S., & Tariq, U. (2024). Digital Overload, Coping Mechanisms, and Student Engagement: An Empirical Investigation Based on the S-O-R Framework. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241236087

Wang, X., Zhao, X., & Yu, C. (2025). The influence of information and social overload on academic performance: The role of social media fatigue, cognitive depletion, and self-control. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.), 30(2), 500164. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSICOE.2025.500164

Wulf, C. (2019). The Formation of the Subject in the Digital Culture: Some Considerations, Hypotheses and Research Results concerning the Education of Young People. Azimuth , VII(14). https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4422472

Zagzebski, L. T. (1996). Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. In Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174763

Zagzebski, L. T. (2020). Epistemic Values: Collected Papers in Epistemology. In Epistemic Values: Collected Papers in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197529171.001.0001

Zriba, H. (2019). The Role of Digital Humanities in the Democratization of Knowledge. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 1(4), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.32996/JHSSS